May 2023
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31

Posts Tagged ‘Washington’

America's Endless Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq

Posted by Admin on October 28, 2011

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27291

by Jack A. Smith

Global Research, October 25, 2011

The 10th anniversary of Washington’s invasion, occupation and seemingly endless war in Afghanistan was observed Oct. 7, but despite President Barack Obama’s pledge to terminate the U.S. “combat mission” by the end of 2014, American military involvement will continue many years longer.

The Afghan war is expanding even further, not only with increasing drone attacks in neighboring Pakistani territory but because of U.S. threats to take far greater unilateral military action within Pakistan unless the Islamabad government roots out “extremists” and cracks down harder on cross-border fighters.

Washington’s tone was so threatening that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had to assure the Pakistani press Oct. 21 that the U.S. did not plan a ground offensive against Pakistan. The next day, Afghan President Hamid Karzai shocked Washington by declaring “God forbid, If ever there is a war between Pakistan and America, Afghanistan will side with Pakistan…. If Pakistan is attacked and if the people of Pakistan needs Afghanistan’s help, Afghanistan will be there with you.”

At the same time, Washington has just suffered a spectacular setback in Iraq, where the Obama Administration has been applying extraordinary pressure on the Baghdad government for over a year to permit many thousands of U.S. troops to remain indefinitely after all American forces are supposed to withdraw at the end of this year.

President Obama received the Iraqi government’s rejection from Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki Oct. 21, and promptly issued a public statement intended to completely conceal the fact that a long-sought U.S. goal has just been obliterated, causing considerable disruption to U.S. plans. Obama made a virtue of necessity by stressing that “Today, I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year.”

This article will first discuss the situation in Afghanistan after 10 years, then take up the Iraq question and what the U.S. may do to compensate for a humiliating and disruptive rebuff.

The United States is well aware it will never win a decisive victory in Afghanistan. At this point, the Obama Administration is anxious to convert the military stalemate into a form of permanent truce, if only the Taliban were willing to accept what amounts to a power sharing deal that would allow Washington to claim the semblance of success after a decade of war.

In addition President Obama seeks to retain a large post-“withdrawal” military presence throughout the country mainly for these reasons:

• To protect its client regime in Kabul led by Karzai, as well as Washington’s other political an commercial interests in the country, and to maintain a menacing military presence on Iran’s eastern border, especially if U.S. troops cannot now remain in Iraq.

• To retain territory in Central Asia for U.S. and NATO military forces positioned close to what Washington perceives to be its two main (though never publicly identified) enemies — China and Russia — at a time when the American government is increasing its political pressure on both countries. Obama is intent upon transforming NATO from a regional into a global adjunct to Washington’s quest for retaining and extending world hegemony. NATO’s recent victory in Libya is a big advance for U.S. ambitions in Africa, even if the bulk of commercial spoils go to France and England. A permanent NATO presence in Central Asia is a logical next step. In essence, Washington’s geopolitical focus is expanding from the Middle East to Central Asia and Africa in the quest for resources, military expansion and unassailable hegemony, especially from the political and economic challenge of rising nations of the global south, led China.

There has been an element of public deception about withdrawing U.S. “combat troops” from Iraq and Afghanistan dating from the first Obama election campaign in 2007-8. Combat troops belong to combat brigades. In a variant of bait-and-switch trickery, the White House reported that all combat brigades departed Iraq in August 2010. Technically this is true, because those that did not depart were simply renamed “advise and assist brigades.” According to a 2009 Army field manual such brigades are entirely capable, “if necessary,” of shifting from “security force assistance” back to combat duties.

In Afghanistan, after the theoretical pullout date, it is probable that many “advise and assist brigades” will remain along with a large complement of elite Joint Special Operations Forces strike teams (SEALs, Green Berets, etc.) and other officially “non-combat” units — from the CIA, drone operators, fighter pilots, government security employees plus “contractor security” personnel, including mercenaries. Thousands of other “non-combat” American soldiers will remain to train the Afghan army.

According to an Oct. 8 Associated Press dispatch, “Senior U.S. officials have spoken of keeping a mix of 10,000 such [special operations-type] forces in Afghanistan, and drawing down to between 20,000 and 30,000 conventional forces to provide logistics and support. But at this point, the figures are as fuzzy as the future strategy.” Estimates of how long the Pentagon will remain in Afghanistan range from 2017 to 2024 to “indefinitely.”

Obama marked the 10th anniversary with a public statement alleging that “Thanks to the extraordinary service of these [military] Americans, our citizens are safer and our nation is more secure”— the most recent of the continuous praise of war-fighters and the conduct of these wars of choice from the White House since the 2001 bombing, invasion and occupation.

Just two days earlier a surprising Pew Social Trend poll of post-9/11 veterans was made public casting doubt about such a characterization. Half the vets said the Afghanistan war wasn’t worth fighting in terms of benefits and costs to the U.S. Only 44% thought the Iraq war was worth fighting. One-third opined that both wars were not worth waging. Opposition to the wars has been higher among the U.S. civilian population. But it’s unusual in a non-conscript army for its veterans to emerge with such views about the wars they volunteered to fight.

The U.S. and its NATO allies issued an unusually optimistic assessment of the Afghan war on Oct. 15, but it immediately drew widespread skepticism. According to the New York Times the next day, “Despite a sharp increase in assassinations and a continuing flood of civilian casualties, NATO officials said that they had reversed the momentum of the Taliban insurgency as enemy attacks were falling for the first time in years…. [This verdict] runs counter to dimmer appraisals from some Afghan officials and other international agencies, including the United Nations. With the United States preparing to withdraw 10,000 troops by the end of this year and 23,000 more by next October, it raises questions about whether NATO’s claims of success can be sustained.”

Less than two weeks earlier German Gen. Harald Kujat, who planned his country’s military support mission in Afghanistan, declared that “the mission fulfilled the political aim of showing solidarity with the United States. But if you measure progress against the goal of stabilizing a country and a region, then the mission has failed.”

According to Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Adm. Mike Mullen, the U.S. presence in Afghanistan is a critically important “long term commitment” and “we’re going to be there longer than 2014.” He made the disclosure to the Senate Armed Services Committee Sept. 22, a week before he retired. In a statement Oct. 3, the Pentagon’s new NATO commander in Afghanistan, Marine Gen. John Allen, declared: “The plan is to win. The plan is to be successful. And so, while some folks might hear that we’re departing in 2014… we’re actually going to be here for a long time.”

Lt. Gen. John Mulholland, departing head of U.S. Army Special Operations Command, told the AP Oct. 8: “We’re moving toward an increased special operations role…,whether it’s counterterrorism-centric, or counterterrorism blended with counterinsurgency.” White House National Security Advisor Tom Donilon said in mid-September that by 2014 “the U.S. remaining force will be basically an enduring presence force focused on counterterrorism.” Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta strongly supports President Obama’s call for an “enduring presence” in Afghanistan beyond 2014.

Former U.S. Afghan commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who was fired last year for his unflattering remarks about Obama Administration officials, said in a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations Oct. 6 that after a decade of fighting in Afghanistan the U.S. was only “50% of the way” toward attaining its goals. “We didn’t know enough and we still don’t know enough,” he said. “Most of us — me included — had a very superficial understanding of the situation and history, and we had a frighteningly simplistic view of recent history, the last 50 years.”

Washington evidently had no idea that one of the poorest and least developed countries in the world — a society of 30 million people where the literacy rate is 28% and life expectancy is just 44 years — would fiercely fight to retain national sovereignty. The Bush Administration, which launched the Afghan war a few weeks after 9/11, evidently ignored the fact that the people of Afghanistan ousted every occupying army from that of Alexander the Great and Genghis Kahn to the British Empire and the USSR.

The U.S. spends on average in excess of $2 billion a week in Afghanistan, not to mention the combined spending of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force, but the critical needs of the Afghan people in terms of health, education, welfare and social services after a full decade of military involvement by the world’s richest countries remain essentially untended.

For example, 220,000 Afghan children under five — one in five — die every year due to pneumonia, poor nutrition, diarrhea and other preventable diseases, according to the State of the World’s Children report released by the UN Children’s Fund. UNICEF also reports the maternal mortality rate with about 1,600 deaths per every 100,000 live births. Save the Children says this amounts to over 18,000 women a year. It is also reported by the UN that 70% of school-age girls do not attend school for various reasons — conservative parents, lack of security, or fear for their lives. All told, about 92% of the Afghan population does not have access to proper sanitation.

Even after a decade of U.S. combat, the overwhelming majority of the Afghan people still have no clear idea why Washington launched the war. According to the UK’s Daily Mail Sept. 9, a new survey by the International Council on Security and Development showed that 92% of 1,000 Afghan men polled had never even heard of the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon — the U.S. pretext for the invasion — and did not know why foreign troops were in the country. (Only men were queried in the poll because many more of them are literate, 43.1% compared to 12.6% of women.)

In another survey, conducted by Germany’s Konrad Adenauer Foundation and released Oct. 18, 56% of Afghans view U.S./NATO troops as an occupying force, not allies as Washington prefers. The survey results show that “there appears to be an increasing amount of anxiety and fear rather than hope.”

Perhaps the most positive news about Afghanistan — and it is a thunderously mixed “blessing” — is that the agricultural economy boomed last year. But, reports the Oct. 11 Business Insider, it’s because “rising opium prices have upped the ante in Afghanistan, and farmers have responded by posting a 61% increase in opium production.” Afghani farmers produce 90% of the world’s opium, the main ingredient in heroin. Half-hearted U.S.-NATO eradication efforts failed because insufficient attention was devoted to providing economic and agricultural substitutes for the cultivation of opium.

Another outcome of foreign intervention and U.S. training is the boundless brutality and corruption of the Afghan police toward civilians and especially Taliban “suspects.” Writing in Antiwar.com John Glaser reported:

“Detainees in Afghan prisons are hung from the ceilings by their wrists, severely beaten with cables and wooden sticks, have their toenails torn off, are treated with electric shock, and even have their genitals twisted until they lose consciousness, according to a study released Oct. 10 by the United Nations. The study, which covered 47 facilities sites in 22 provinces, found ‘a compelling pattern and practice of systematic torture and ill-treatment’ during interrogation by U.S.-supported Afghan authorities. Both U.S. and NATO military trainers and counterparts have been working closely with these authorities, consistently supervising the detention facilities and funding their operations.”

In mid-September Human Rights Watch documented that U.S.-supported anti-Taliban militias are responsible for many human rights abuses that are overlooked by their American overseers. At around the same time the American Open Society Foundations revealed that the Obama Administration has tripled the number of nighttime military raids on civilian homes, which terrorize many families. The report noted that “An estimated 12 to 20 raids now occur per night, resulting in thousands of detentions per year, many of whom are non-combatants.” The U.S. military admits that half the arrests are “mistakes.”

Meanwhile, it was reported in October that in the first nine months this year U.S.-NATO drones conducted nearly 23,000 surveillance missions in the Afghanistan sky. With nearly 85 flights a day, the Obama Administration has almost doubled the daily amount in the last two years. Hundreds of civilians, including nearly 170 children, have been killed in the Afghan-Pakistan border areas from drone attacks. Miniature killer/surveillance drones — small enough to be carried in backpacks— are soon expected to be distributed to U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

So far the Afghanistan war has taken the lives of some 1,730 American troops and about a thousand from NATO. There are no reliable figures on the number Afghan civilians killed since the beginning of the war. The UN’s Assistance Mission to Afghanistan did not start to count such casualties until 2007. According to the Voice of America Oct. 7, “Each year, the civilian death toll has risen, from more than 1,500 dead in 2007 to more than 2,700 in 2010. And in the first half of this year, the UN office reported there were 2,400 civilians killed in war-related incidents.”

At minimum the war has cost American taxpayers about a half-trillion dollars since 2001. The U.S. will continue to spend billions in the country for many years to come and the final cost — including interest on war debts that will be carried for scores more years — will mount to multi-trillions that future generations will have to pay. At present there are 94,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan plus about 37,000 NATO troops. Another 45,000 well paid “contractors” perform military duties, and many are outright mercenaries.

Washington is presently organizing, arming, training and financing hundreds of thousands of Afghan troops and police forces, and is expected to continue paying some $5 billion a year for this purpose at least until 2025.

The U.S. government has articulated various different objectives for its engagement in Afghanistan over the years. Crushing al-Qaeda and defeating the Taliban have been most often mentioned, but as an Oct. 7 article from the Council on Foreign Relations points out: “The main U.S. goals in Afghanistan remain uncertain. They have meandered from marginalizing the Taliban to state-building, to counterinsurgency, to counterterrorism, to — most recently — reconciliation and negotiation with the Taliban. But the peace talks remain nascent and riddled with setbacks. Karzai suspended the talks after the assassination of Burhanuddin Rabbani, the government’s chief negotiator, which the Afghan officials blamed on the Pakistan-based Haqqani network. The group denies it.”

There is another incentive for the U.S. to continue fighting in Afghanistan — to eventually convey the impression of victory, an absolute domestic political necessity.

The most compelling reason for the Afghan war is geopolitical, as noted above — finally obtaining a secure military foothold for the U.S. and its NATO accessory in the Central Asian backyards of China and Russia . In addition, a presence in Afghanistan places the U.S. in close military proximity to two volatile nuclear powers backed by the U.S. but not completely under its control by any means (Pakistan, India). Also, this fortuitous geography is flanking the extraordinary oil and natural gas wealth of the Caspian Basin and energy-endowed former Soviet Muslim republics such as Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan.

In Iraq, the Obama Administration’s justification for retaining troops after the end of this year was ostensibly to train the Iraqi military and police forces, but there were other reasons:

• Washington seeks to remain in Iraq to keep an eye on Baghdad because it fears a mutually beneficial alliance may develop between Iraq and neighboring Iran, two Shi’ite societies in an occasionally hostile Sunni Muslim world, weakening American hegemony in the strategically important oil-rich Persian Gulf region and ultimately throughout the Middle East/North Africa.

• The U.S. also seeks to safeguard lucrative economic investments in Iraq, and the huge future profits expected by American corporations, especially in the denationalized petroleum sector. Further, Pentagon and CIA forces were stationed — until now, it seems — in close proximity to Iran’s western border, a strategic position to invade or bring about regime change.

Under other conditions, the U.S. may simply have insisted on retaining its troops regardless of Iraqi misgivings, but the Status of Forces compact governing this matter can only be changed legally by mutual agreement between Washington and Baghdad. The concord was arranged in December 2008 between Prime Minister Maliki and President George W. Bush — not Obama, who now takes credit for ending the Iraq war despite attempting to extend the mission of a large number of U.S. troops.

At first Washington wanted to retain more than 30,000 troops plus a huge diplomatic and contractor presence in Iraq after “complete” withdrawal. Maliki — pushed by many of the country’s political factions, including some influenced by Iran’s opposition to long-term U.S. occupation — held out for a much smaller number.

Early in October Baghdad decided that 3,000 to 5,000 U.S. troops in a training-only capacity was the most that could be accommodated. In addition, the Iraqis in effect declared a degree of independence from Washington by insisting that remaining American soldiers must be kept on military bases and not be granted legal immunity when in the larger society. Washington, which has troops stationed in countries throughout the world, routinely insists upon legal exemption for its foreign legions as a matter of imperial hubris, and would not compromise.

The White House has indicated that an arrangement may yet be worked out to permit some American trainers and experts to remain, perhaps as civilians or contractors. Shi’ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, a staunch opponent of the U.S. occupation, has suggested Iraq should employ trainers for its armed forces from other countries, but this is impractical for a country using American arms and planes.

Regardless, the White House is increasing the number of State Department employees in Iraq from 8,000 to an almost unbelievable 16,000, mostly stationed at the elephantine new embassy in Baghdad’s Green Zone quasi-military enclave, in new American consulates in other cities, and in top “advisory” positions in many of the of the regime’s ministries, particularly the oil ministry. Half the State Department personnel, 8,000 people, will handle “security” duties, joined by some 5,000 new private “security contractors.”

Thus, at minimum the U.S. will possess 13,000 of its own armed “security” forces, and there’s still a possibility Baghdad and Washington will work out an arrangement for adding a limited number of “non-combat” military trainers, openly or by other means.

In his Oct. 21 remarks, Obama sought to transform the total withdrawal he sought to avoid into a simulacrum of triumph for the troops and himself: “The last American soldier will cross the border out of Iraq with their heads held high, proud of their success, and knowing that the American people stand united in our support for our troops…. That is how America’s military efforts in Iraq will end.”

Heads held high, proud of success — for an unjust, illegal war based on lies that is said to have cost over a million Iraqi lives and created four million refugees! It has been estimated that the final U.S.. costs of the Iraq war will be over $5 trillion when the debt and interest are finally paid off decades from now.

If President Obama is reelected— even should the Iraq war actually end — he will be coordinating U.S. involvement in wars and occupations in Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and now Uganda (where American 100 combat troops have just been inserted). Add to this various expanding drone campaigns, and such adventures as Washington’s support for Israel against the Palestinians and for the Egyptian military regime against popular aspirations for full democracy, followed by the backing of dictatorial regimes in a half-dozen countries, and continual threats against Iran.

Washington’s $1.4 trillion annual military and national security expenditures are a major factor behind America’s monumental national debt and the cutbacks in social services for the people, but aside from White House rhetoric about reducing redundant Pentagon expenditures, overall war/security budgets are expected to increase over the next several years.

The Bush and Obama Administrations have manipulated realty to convince American public opinion that the Iraq and Afghan wars are ending in U.S. successes. Washington fears the resurrection of the “Vietnam Syndrome” that resulted after the April 1975 U.S. defeat in Indochina. The “syndrome” led to a 15-year disinclination by the American people to support aggressive, large-scale U.S. wars against small, poor countries in the developing third world until the January 1991 Gulf War, part one of the two-part Iraq war that continued in March 2003.

According to an article in the Oct. 9 New York Times titled “The Other War Haunting Obama,” author, journalist and Harvard emeritus professor Marvin Kalb wrote: ” Ten years after the start of the war in Afghanistan, an odd specter haunts the Obama White House — the specter of Vietnam, a war lost decades before. Like Banquo’s ghost, it hovers over the White House still, an unwelcome memory of where America went wrong, a warning of what may yet go wrong.”

This fear of losing another war to a much smaller adversary — and perhaps suffering the one-term fate of President Lyndon Johnson who presided over the Vietnam debacle — evidently was a factor behind President Obama’s decision to vastly expand the size of the U.S. military commitment to Afghanistan and why the White House is now planning a long-term troop presence beyond the original pullout date.

Today’s combat directly touches the lives of only a small minority Americans — militarily members and families — and much of the majority remains uninformed or misinformed about many of the causes and effects of the Iraq/Afghan adventures. Obama may thus eventually be able to convey the illusion of military success, which will help pave the way for future imperial violence unless the people of the United States wise up and act en masse to prevent future aggressive wars.

Jack A. Smith is the Editor of the Activist Newsletter

Jack A. Smith is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Jack A. Smith

Posted in Global Research, War Quotient | Tagged: afghanistan, Barack Obama, Hamid Karzai, iraq, NATO, Pakistan, United States, Washington | Leave a Comment »

Pakistan and "The Haqqani Network" : The Latest Orchestrated Threat to America and The End of History

Posted by Admin on September 30, 2011

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26797

by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Global Research, September 27, 2011

– 2011-09-26

Have you ever before heard of the Haqqanis? I didn’t think so. Like Al Qaeda, about which no one had ever heard prior to 9/11, the “Haqqani Network” has popped up in time of need to justify America’s next war–Pakistan.

President Obama’s claim that he had Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden exterminated deflated the threat from that long-serving bogyman. A terror organization that left its leader, unarmed and undefended, a sitting duck for assassination no longer seemed formidable. Time for a new, more threatening, bogyman, the pursuit of which will keep the “war on terror” going.

Now America’s “worst enemy” is the Haqqanis. Moreover, unlike Al Qaeda, which was never tied to a country, the Haqqani Network, according to Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, is a “veritable arm” of the Pakistani government’s intelligence service, ISI. Washington claims that the ISI ordered its Haggani Network to attack the US Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, on September 13 along with the US military base in Wadak province.

Senator Lindsey Graham, a member of the Armed Services committee and one of the main Republican warmongers, declared that “all options are on the table” and gave the Pentagon his assurance that in Congress there was broad bipartisan support for a US military attack on Pakistan.

As Washington has been killing large numbers of Pakistani civilians with drones and has forced the Pakistani army to hunt for Al Qaeda throughout most of Pakistan, producing tens of thousands or more of dislocated Pakistanis in the process, Sen. Graham must have something larger in mind.

The Pakistani government thinks so, too. The Pakistani prime minister,Yousuf Raza Gilani, called his foreign minister home from talks in Washington and ordered an emergency meeting of the government to assess the prospect of an American invasion.

Meanwhile, Washington is rounding up additional reasons to add to the new threat from the Haqqanis to justify making war on Pakistan: Pakistan has nuclear weapons and is unstable and the nukes could fall into the wrong hands; the US can’t win in Afghanistan until it has eliminated sanctuaries in Pakistan; blah-blah.

Washington has been trying to bully Pakistan into launching a military operation against its own people in North Waziristan. Pakistan has good reasons for resisting this demand. Washington’s use of the new “Haqqani threat” as an invasion excuse could be Washington’s way of overcoming Pakistan’s resistance to attacking its North Waziristan provence, or it could be, as some Pakistani political leaders say, and the Pakistani government fears, a “drama” created by Washington to justify a military assault on yet another Muslim country.

Over the years of its servitude as an American puppet, the Pakistan government has brought this on itself. Pakistanis let the US purchase the Pakistan government, train and equip its military, and establish CIA interface with Pakistani intelligence. A government so dependent on Washington could say little when Washington began violating its sovereignty, sending in drones and special forces teams to kill alleged Al Qaeda, but usually women, children, and farmers. Unable to subdue after a decade a small number of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan, Washington has placed the blame for its military failure on Pakistan, just as Washington blamed the long drawn-out war on the Iraqi people on Iran’s alleged support for the Iraqi resistance to American occupation.

Some knowledgeable analysts’ about whom you will never hear in the “mainstream media,” say that the US military/security complex and their neoconservative whores are orchestrating World War III before Russia and China can get prepared. As a result of the communist oppression, a signifiant percentage of the Russian population is in the American orbit. These Russians trust Washington more than they trust Putin. The Chinese are too occupied dealing with the perils of rapid economic growth to prepare for war and are far behind the threat.

War, however, is the lifeblood of the profits of the military/security complex, and war is the chosen method of the neoconservatives for achieving their goal of American hegemony.

Pakistan borders China and former constituent parts of the Soviet Union in which the US now has military bases on Russia’s borders. US war upon and occupation of Pakistan is likely to awaken the somnolent Russians and Chinese. As both possess nuclear ICBMs, the outcome of the military/security complex’s greed for profits and the neoconservatives’ greed for empire could be the extinction of life on earth.

The patriots and super-patriots who fall in with the agendas of the military-security complex and the flag-waving neoconservatives are furthering the “end-times” outcome so fervently desired by the rapture evangelicals, who will waft up to heaven while the rest of us die on earth.

This is not President Reagan’s hoped for outcome from ending the cold war.

Paul Craig Roberts is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Paul Craig Roberts

Posted in Global Research | Tagged: al qaeda, Haqqani Network, osama bin laden, Pakistan, Pakistan government, United States, Washington, World War III | Leave a Comment »

On October 6, Let's Make a National Clamor for Peace

Posted by Admin on September 30, 2011

http://www.truth-out.org/october-6-lets-make-national-clamor-peace/1317305972

Thursday 29 September 2011

by: Robert Naiman, Truthout | Op-Ed

(Image: JR / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Spc. Bryanna Poulin, The U.S. Army)

On October 7, 2011, the United States will have been at war for ten years.

Let’s mark the occasion by making a national clamor for peace so loud that Congress, the president and big media will have to pay attention.

October 7 happens to fall on a Friday this year. If you get to choose, Friday is not necessarily the most strategic day to make a national clamor for peace, because 1) Congress will likely not be in session; 2) Friday is, in general, a crummy day to try to get media attention; and 3) even if these two things weren’t true or relevant, Friday is not a great day to try to hold public attention. People’s thoughts are turning to the weekend and then the weekend erases the chalkboard.

Moreover, the press has to cover the anniversary of the war, but these stories are going to be largely written and produced before Friday. The default media narrative will be: America has lost interest in the wars, because of the economy and unemployment, because “the wars are already winding down,” or some other story that journalists or editors will make up. We have to beat this default media narrative. To beat it, we need to get in front of it.

So, let’s mark the occasion on Thursday, October 6. Let’s have a national, “ecumenical” day of action for peace: to end the wars and cut the military budget.

By “ecumenical,” I mean this: everybody will “worship” in their own way. People who are willing to call Congress, will call Congress. People are willing to go to demonstrations, will go to demonstrations. People who get active online, will get active online. But everybody who wants peace will do something for peace on October 6. In the comments below, tell us what you are going to do to act for peace on October 6.

Call Congress: right now, the Congressional “supercommittee” is considering proposals to cut the US government debt by $1.2 trillion over ten years. One obvious choice: end the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and cut the military budget. Poll datashows that when you ask people “if the supercommittee cuts the budget, where should they cut?” military spending walks to victory. But the military contractors and war profiteers, who have grown fat from ten years of war spending, are pressing Congress not to cut the military budget and to cut your Medicare benefits instead. If you do nothing else for peace on October 6, call at least one of your representatives in Congress – particularly if they are on the supercommittee – and tell them to end the wars and cut the military budget. The Congressional switchboard is202-225-3121.

In this speech on the budget, I explain why people who don’t want Congress to cut domestic spending and want to save the hundreds of thousands of jobs threatened by domestic spending cuts should be pounding on the supercommittee to end the wars and cut the military budget:

Demonstrate: on October 6, peace advocates will occupy Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC. All around the country, “occupy [city]” protests are already springing up in solidarity with the Wall Street protests. If you can get to one of these protests, go. On October 6, raise the banner of peace. If “occupying” isn’t your cup of tea, have a vigil outside your representative or senator’s office, or a federal building, or anyplace where you will be visible to the public. Send a press release to all local media the morning of the day before and call the local media and make sure they got your press release and are thinking of coming.

Here’s an idea that might spark media interest: form a group called “Tea Party Patriots for Peace,” demanding cuts to wasteful big government spending on war. (After all, war spending is the majority of federal discretionary spending.) Stop taxing us to pay for war!

Buzz it up online. On October 6, help “action for peace” be a focus of attention online. Blog and comment about actions taking place for peace; share writing about and coverage of actions for peace by others. Help it be the case that you can’t look anywhere online on October 6 without seeing action for peace.

On Friday, October 7, don’t let big media say that Americans aren’t acting to press for peace. In the comments below, tell us what you are going to do to act for peace on October 6.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

Posted in Truthout Articles | Tagged: Freedom Plaza, October 6, Thursday, United States, wall street, War in Afghanistan (2001–present), Washington, Washington DC | Leave a Comment »

UFO over Lafayette, Colorado, caught on camera

Posted by Admin on March 31, 2011

Grainy B&W image of supposed UFO, Passoria, Ne...

Unidentifiable Flying Object

http://in.news.yahoo.com/ufo-over-lafayette–colorado–caught-on-camera.html

ANI – Tue, Mar 29, 2011 4:49 PM IST

Washington, Mar 29 (ANI): A strange triangular formation of red lights over Lafayette, Colorado, which was caught on camera, has left many spooked and wondering if it was a UFO.

Leroy van der Vegt and his son Nick captured the sight on camera, and the unidentified red lights did not blink but were in a triangular shape as they hovered in the sky.

“It was completely quiet. No noise at all,” ABC News quoted van der Vegt as saying. He doesn’t know what it was but he is sure that what he saw was not a satellite, helicopter or airplane.

He said the triangle eventually headed northeast and the lights faded. Lester Valdez and all of his neighbours saw the unidentified lights.

“I have never witnessed anything like that,” Valdez said. He said they looked like tiny, bright alien ships from ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind‘.

“It was exactly something like that where you see an object and they all got into a pattern and they stood in a pattern, and they all moved in a direction and then they pretty much dropped and that was it,” Valdez said.

Sceptics like Lafayette residents Katie and Kevin Caron say there must be a reasonable explanation for the lights that doesn’t involve little green men.

“There’s a lot of things you can’t explain but the idea of it being an alien spacecraft is pretty wacky,” Kevin added. (ANI)

Did Earth encounter pieces of an alien visitor yesterday?

Posted by Admin on November 8, 2010

Comet Hyakutake

Thu, Nov 4 03:30 PM

Washington, Nov 04 (ANI): Last night, Earth apparently encountered pieces of an alien visitor, according to scientists.

It seems tiny pieces of Comet Hartley 2 may have presented a spectacular and startling sky show across the country yesterday.

NASA meteor experts had predicted it was a long shot, but the evenings of November 2nd and 3rd might display a meteor shower from dust, which puffed off this visiting comet as it passed within twelve million miles of Earth.

And indeed, the Center for Astrophysics has collected several sightings of bright meteors called fireballs, which result when comet dust burns up in Earth’s atmosphere.

Helga Cabral in Seascape, reported, “I saw bright white ball and tail, arcing towards the ocean. It was quite beautiful and it looked like it was headed out to sea and so picture perfect it could have been a movie!”

Three thousand miles away just north of Boston, Eresa Witham witnessed a similar cosmic event.

“I was in the Revere area about 7:15 last night, driving north on Route 1, when a brilliant object with a tail passed in front of me-very similar in appearance to a shooting star but it appeared much lower to the Earth than a typical shooting star would be. If it weren’t for the fact that I had my daughter with me, I’d begin to believe I’d imagined it.”

Comet Hartley 2 has put on quite a nice show for amateur astronomers over the past few weeks, sporting a vivid green coma or halo around it and a golden auburn tail of dust.

NASA’s Deep Impact/EPOXI probe will present dramatic close-up images of the comet when it zooms past the nucleus on November 4th. (ANI)

Did Earth encounter pieces of an alien visitor last night? (yubanet.com)
Did Earth encounter pieces of an alien visitor last night? (physorg.com)
Meteors From Comet Hartley 2 Amaze Skywatchers (space.com)
Comet Hartley 2 and the Amazing Tail! (scienceblogs.com)
NASA Takes Rare Photos Of Comet Hartley 2 With Deep Impact Craft [Video] (realestateradiousa.com)
Comet Hartley 2 Gets Visit from Deep Impact Spacecraft (space.com)
Scientists Watch for a “Hartley-id” Meteor Shower (spacefellowship.com)
Twin Fireballs May Have Come From Comet Hartley 2 (space.com)
Imabug: EPOXI Spacecraft Encounters Comet – Science News (sciencenews.org)
Close Encounter With Comet Hartley 2 Sets NASA Astir (nytimes.com)

Posted in Press Releases | Tagged: Boston, Comet, Comet dust, earth, Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Meteoroid, nasa, Washington | Leave a Comment »

US-Saudi arms deal ripples from Iran to Israel

Posted by Admin on October 21, 2010

FILE - In this Sunday, Jan. 25, 2009 file photo, ...

By BRIAN MURPHY and ADAM SCHRECK, Associated Press Writers – 52 mins ago

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – As American and Saudi officials spent months quietly hammering out a wish list for a mammoth sale of American warplanes and other weapons to the oil-rich kingdom, leaders in Iran were busy publicly displaying their advances in missiles, naval craft and air power.

In one memorable bit of political theater, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stood under a cascade of glitter in August to unveil a drone bomber — dubbed the “ambassador of death” — that he claimed would keep foes in the region “paralyzed” on their bases.

The response by Washington and its cornerstone Arab ally, Saudi Arabia, moved a step ahead Wednesday. The Obama administrationnotified Congress of plans to sell as many as 84 new F-15 fighter jets, helicopters and other gear with an estimated $60 billion price tag.

The proposed deal — one of the biggest single U.S. arms sales — is clearly aimed at countering Iran’s rising military might and efforts to expand its influence.

But it ties together other significant narratives in the region, including an apparent retooling of Israeli policies to tacitly support a stronger, American-armed Saudi Arabia because of common worries about Iran.

It also reinforces the Gulf as the Pentagon’s front-line military network against Iran even as the U.S. sandwiches the Islamic republic with troops and bases in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“In this way, Saudi Arabia does become some sort of buffer between Israel and Iran,” said Pieter Wezeman, a senior researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, a Swedish think tank that tracks arms sales.

Israel has made no diplomatic rumblings over the proposed Saudi deal — a marked contrast to almost automatic objections decades ago to Pentagon pacts with Arab nations. It’s widely seen as an acknowledgment that Israel’s worries over Iran and its nuclear program far outweigh any small shifts in the Israel-Arab balance of power.

Israel is moving toward a policy of “pick your fights,” said Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar Ilan University near Tel Aviv.

“After all,” he added, “Saudi Arabia is not such a big threat to us.”

And Israel does not come out of the current American arms bazaar empty handed. Earlier this month, it signed a deal to purchase 20 F-35 stealth fighters that could possibly reach Iran undetected by radar. Israel has an option for 75 more.

“This equipment is primarily to give (Israel) a better feeling facing the Iranian threat. It is not related to Israeli-Arab relations,” said Inbar. “Ironically, in the current situation, Saudi Arabia is in the same strategic boat as Israel is in facing the Iranian threat.”

Besides the new fighters for Saudi Arabia, the U.S. plans to upgrade an additional 70 of the kingdom’s existing F-15s. State Department and Pentagon officials told lawmakers the sales also will include 190 helicopters, including Apaches and Black Hawks, as well as an array of missiles, bombs, delivery systems and accessories such as night-vision goggles and radar warning systems.

Congress has 30 days to block the deal, which was first revealed in September but has been in negotiations for months. U.S. officials say they aren’t expecting significant opposition.

Iran, meanwhile, has concentrated on its missile arsenal overseen by the powerful Revolutionary Guard. Its solid-fuel Sajjil missile has a reported range of more than 1,250 miles (2,000 kilometers) — within range of Israel and all main U.S. bases in the region.

Iran’s navy has staged war games in the Gulf and announced major additions to its fleet, including three Iranian-built submarines designed to operate in the Gulf’s shallow waters.

It marks the Gulf as a buyer’s market for arms, led by the U.S. as the dominant Western military power from Kuwait to Oman. Throughout the Gulf, Washington counts on access to Arab allies’ air bases, logistics hubs and the Bahrain headquarters of America’s naval powerhouse in the region — the U.S. 5th Fleet.

A report last month by the U.S. General Accountability Office said Washington approved $22 billion worth of military equipment transfers to the six Gulf Arab states between fiscal 2005 and 2009 through a Pentagon-managed program.

More than half was earmarked for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, including a $6.5 billion deal in 2009 for the UAE to buy the Patriot missile defense system.

The UAE agreement was the largest single arms approval during the five-year period — but is dwarfed by the proposed Saudi deal.

The researcher Wezeman said Iran is clearly the top perceived threat for the Gulf Arabs, but there are background concerns about Iraq’s stability and the unrest in neighboring Yemen that includes Shiite Hawthi rebels and Islamic extremists linked to al-Qaida. The Saudi military was drawn into rare fighting in northern Yemen starting late last year, using airstrikes and artillery to battle a Hawthi rebellion that was spilling across the border.

“Of course it’s against Iran. Of course it’s against Yemen,” said Wezeman. “You can read between the lines … but there are not any official statements about it.”

Wezeman’s group issued a report this month that estimates the eight nations ringing the Gulf — including rivals Iran and Saudi Arabia — accounted for 10 percent of all conventional weapons imports between 2005-2009.

The appetite was on display earlier this month when envoys from more than 50 U.S. defense and aerospace firms held talks in Abu Dhabi, where they were welcomed by the UAE’s minister of foreign trade at an opulent hotel on the shores of the Gulf.

As the American defense budget tightens, the Gulf’s deep pockets beckon.

“This is a critical time for our companies abroad as the U.S. defense budget continues to face pressures at home,” said a statement from Lawrence Farrell, head of the National Defense Industrial Association based outside Washington.

Jane Kinninmont, a Middle East and Africa specialist at the Economist Intelligence Unit, said concerns over Iran are the primary motivation for the Saudi arms expansion. But she wonders how much the untested Gulf forces rattle Iranian commanders who are almost all veterans of the 1980-88 war with Iraq.

“I would not be surprised if the Iranians are pretty cynical about the armies here,” she said during an interview in Dubai. “To put it bluntly, they’ve fought a war.”

___

Associated Press Writers Mark Lavie and Aron Heller in Jerusalem, and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this report.

US-Saudi arms deal ripples from Iran to Israel (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
“US Announces $60 Billion Arms Sale For Saudi Arabia” and related posts (patdollard.com)
US confirms $60bn Saudi arms plan (bbc.co.uk)
U.S. Agrees to Sell Up to $60 Billion of Military Aircraft to Saudi Arabia (dailyfinance.com)
“US to sell $60 billion in advanced arms to Saudi Arabia” and related posts (online.worldmag.com)
US to sell $60 billion in advanced arms to Saudi Arabia (telegraph.co.uk)

Posted in Geo-Politics | Tagged: arms deal, iran, israel, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Middle East, military, pentagon, Saudi Arabia, United States, Washington, Weapons | Leave a Comment »

Integration Into ET Reality 2

Posted by Admin on October 11, 2010

Godfather of Exopolitics

Integration Into ET Reality (Part 2)
By Ed Komarek
2/1/2010
Copy and Distribute Freely
My Blog: http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/

I have had some very good feedback from a source on the initial fishing expedition article, http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/integration-into-et-reality.html so I wanted to do at least one more article on this important subject. I realize that many of my readers feel that I am often skating on very thin evidential ice, but it is important to realize that concepts and ideas are access codes.

If one can adequately grasp a true concept even on thin evidence, that concept can then be used to acquire additional information from sources that further builds on the evidential base. Unfortunately Skeptics don’t understand this and so become mentally captured in a Catch 22 conceptual denial trap of their own design.

What follows are parts of an Internet conversation with a old contact of mine who I believe may have a NSA scientific background in extraterrestrial affairs as well as JASON connections. ( The relationship has been strained over the years due to social mistakes and third party complications but that is too long a story to be told here.)

A well respected CIA intelligence scientific professional known to many of us on the Internet told me several years ago that the technical writings of this source were brilliant, but said to me that he would have to deny that if questioned. What follows are fragments of email conversations stimulated by my last article and a conversation with a young up and coming bright academic who is catching on fast to the game at hand.

After writing this article my source wrote an additional email that contains some of the kind of technical information and thinking that caused this well respected CIA contact to comment on the material as brilliant. (If you skeptics think these academic scientific writings amended to this article are of a truck driver you are out of your mind!)

“Hey! I’m not THAT old, Ed. Hahaha, Retirement, if what I do can be called that, is actually more fun than paid work. Well, onto the reason for this missive: There is a far broader spectrum of contacts with extraterrestrials across the board than hitherto realized by anyone. The problem is that is is scattered, and the means are also mixed.

The groups we are involved with is varied and already on the ground in many places of our planet, e.g., Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, in the Midwest; on the west coast, northern California, certain parts of Oregon, and the Seattle area in Washington state. Then there are those mentioned by James who have taken up residence in the south land of CA, under aegis of proprietaries doing business on a broad spectrum of scientific applications. This is only in the U.S.A.

On other countries, the integration is much higher and also much more fruitful. I’ve been working on and off on a book about the link, and in it, we (my colleagues and I) have made mention of these as not only face to face contacts but also as business contacts for various purposes, including but not limited to foodstuff and livestock to specification. Not all of them fall into the cute ET of Spielberg’s lore.

Many of them are meat eaters, but finicky at that. This is not to say meat is the sole source of protein for these people. They also enjoy a wide spectrum of beans and greens. Little or no cheese, thank you. This last one at least from past experience with foods served at the annual conferences. All of these conferences are with NGOs, again from a wide spectrum of service orientations.

Then there is the work done by George LoBuono in and around U.C. Berkeley and up the road on I-80 at the other UC. Ed, you know George from your work with exopolitics with Michael. Chase that one down for more info on what he and others are doing. Very interesting Intel.

As to your comments it seems that integration is an exaggerated term for something far more simple and already under way: the connectivity between life forms with different cultural background, technologies, and imperatives. I think George’s framework of thinking is a useful one, especially as it pertains to imperatives, which every group in our planetary vicinity manifests almost on contact.

Their seeming “psychic superiority” is a mirage of something far more mundane: these guys use a form of thinking and communication that we, for the lack of a better word, have come to call “topological thinking.” I’ll gladly send you whatever I wrote on it. Let me know. But the place to start would be to read George’s Primer about aliens. There are upward of 100 bio-kinds from a this and other galaxies, as we understand it. However, as bio-kinds, I’ve only seen two: humanoids and sauroids, although there is one other type that resembles both without being neither.

Noticeably, mother nature and the creator of the universe seem to be quite economical in what they do so well: create life forms for an apparent single biological source. Recently, Ed asked me to comment on a series of questions about interfaces said to have been done by no such agency; the questions were good ones and to the point; however, I’m not a computer expert by any stretch of anyone’s imagination and have to comments to make or any pearls to contribute. Source is referring to this article, http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/2010/01/alien-computers.html )

That there is interface, I have no doubts, especially with regard to entangled computers that, without being quantum computers, behave like ones. Got attacked by one not to far back. Some headaches and little damage, but that’s about it. Nevertheless, they are out there. Let me make a suggestion in the strongest possible terms: get hold of LoBuono’s Primer and read it, cover to cover. If you don’t have one, let me know, will send you one.

While hopping and skipping across a broad swath of topics, he does cover what is absolutely necessary for any thinking human COBE (complex oscillating biological entity) from Earth to consider, thinking galactically but also considering things locally with such a mind-scape. His “transversals” are quite real; we’ve met and befriended one, who occasionally tweaks one of us for a short in passing conversation. George raises issues we ALL need to think about, seriously.

These guys are not necessarily our saviors, fantasies aside. We engage them for what they are: people with agendas. We need to know theirs, update our Intel on them and theirs daily, weekly, monthly, annually. And keep the lines of communication open. And the lines of business; these guys are NOT without means as we understand value (money). Some already have human cohorts with which they work and through whom do business with the world at large. Whoever said ET was not a businessperson does not understand the changing realities of living on and near Earth space. This is also way beyond the metal ships that fascinate everyone.

Ed, you’ve got to see what’s up with the group in socal. If blocked, seek aid from James and his group. He’s come out with an interesting tract about us as sovereign integrals. Very much to the point. They are hosted by a proprietary I was told, and they are most likely the group that he talked about in his writings earlier this decade. It may well be the head of the serpent as well, which seems to now to have caught your fancy and attention. SAMs are here, brother. And they are not nice. Don’t play nice. Don’t like us, it seems. I for one want nothing to do with them. So if you can get something on that topic, we’ll all be appreciative of your reportorial efforts. You have my best wishes on it.

Stay in touch and thanks for the compliment Ed. It will only redouble my campaign to continue working at decreasing my bio-electric age.. Right now it’s at 46, but I think I can do better. My biological age is 62. Sonobioelectrogravitic health is important. And we can all do it. How do you think these guys have long lives? They feed off the vacuum at the cellular level, some of them! We’re using that technology now with people who are coming down with the likes of ALS, fibromyalgia, and others. Still too early to tell.

However, there are great results with fibromyalgia with a few treated over the net. Ed, this universe, indeed, all of creation, is idiomaterial – thought and matter simultaneously. It is also bi-causal, not uni-causal as public domain science would have us believe. How do you think these guys draw from a vacuum that is itself very deterministic? Each cell can be made to turn into a mini black hole and, like a car at a gas pump, pump energy needed and no more. We were told this by some of them, and it is the same thing the people we taught to do this with their fibro are reporting happening to them as well. Go figure.

Namaste. (Name deleted)”

In this note, let me expand upon some ideas for you to chew on and discuss openly on your blog and with your open and secret contacts.

There is a problem in the way USG and the network that participates in the unified response to off-world presence and engagement with them. But it is not a cover up as a knee jerk reactionary response to something poohbas and powers-that-be would consider “threats” in the classic X-Files universe sense of the word. There are no Scully and Mulder in the real world. If they were, they would find things confusing because the phenomenon is multiphasic.

There is more than one group with which contact, trading and TTPs (technology transfer programs) takes place. The better known in the public domain is the one mentioned by James, known as the court, because it is the one with the largest footprint and trail. It also happens to be one that has integral compenetration into so many aspects of life on earth it is not even funny anymore. This is also one in which I believe there to be the highest integration of interests coming to the trough represented by the company (a massive proprietary) that licenses the technologies made available to those who pay.

The sucklings are the companies that pay to get some version of technologies that are made available to the unrecognized deep cover unit of no such agency, operating under the aegis of the proprietary. James has intentionally or unintentionally put a fly in the ointment, and the dance since I hear has changed. The tune and tenor is different now, but the elemental signature of all those concerned has remained the same, which to me means it is still business as usual.

The idea of the need of a united front in dealing with off-world groups is a real and viable one, and so is the need – real but not easy to achieve. There are ideas and needs within USG-network circles and ideas and needs within NGOs. Ideas differ according to the side which represents some aspect of USG/network interests, either military or economic.

Ideas in NGO circles also differ according to the definitions given by the specific group, and the vantage points of the NGOs themselves. The need for advanced technology is a given, although circumscribed to developed countries and advanced technology corporate entities. Cost benefit favors those who pay to become recipients of often diluted advanced methods which, still, are more advanced than anything on Earth. The litany of such beneficiaries, while classified by all accounts, is, I’m told, very long and not all of them are American companies.

The other thing to consider in your definition of the problem with ETs is your perception of such as being “fragmented.” Actually, we are the fish and all we see is water. The cognitive means we use to deal with them severely undercut our ability to deal with them: somewhat like using DC-3s to combat people with F-22s. They use a form of topological thinking, which uses a completely different way of structuring thinking architectures such that, as George LoBuono’s experience with transversals and other off-worlders teach us, make human beings less than able to stay the course with them.

We are handicapped by our use of fairly linear thinking styles and by the absence of sufficient neural networks interconnected to allow wide associations, layered considerations of topics, and interconnections between topics. However, all of this can be easily corrected, by using a wider swath of our natural intelligence and all of our brains. Yes, all four of them. More on this later in this commentary.

Here, I want to spend time discussing a short list of imperatives I see we have as human beings, as a biokind, as a civilization, and as a budding galactic member of a (yes, George LoBuono is quite correct) overpopulated galaxy and universe. I am not going to focus on concerns already so ably expressed by George. Instead, I’m going to look at imperatives we must recognize, develop and adopt as working perspectives and utilitarian methods in our dealings with off-worlders.

We, I and my colleagues, have done so, to much profit in gaining a wider, more profound level of grasp and understanding of issues, problems, opportunities and challenges we face with their presence on our planet, the solar system, and their amalgamation into our civilization and society.

FIRST IMPERATIVE
LEARN TO USE TOPOLOGICAL THINKING

From here onward, I quote from an essay I wrote and published on the net some years ago, and from a book in process I am currently writing. (Edit note: Some of the paragraphs were quite long so I broke them up in this treatise from source.)

Since our appearance on the face of the Earth as a sapient biokind (or what Zecharia Sitchin called homo sapiens sapiens), we humans of Earth have been undergoing an evolution of consciousness in spurts of growth, not in a linear fashion. We have been undergoing a kind of evolution in our way of thinking based upon our abilities to become able and comfortable in using our own nervous system with which to manifest these evolving modes of conscious mental and psychophysiological behaviors.

Early on, we deployed a use of our higher mental capabilities in a dualistic fashion: we behaved according to what we could manifest as whole-prehension consciousness (or right-hemispheric thinking) and as emerging intellectual-rational thinking (or left-hemispheric mental behavior). It is this stage that Julian Jaynes referred to as important aspect of bicameral consciousness.

We still do manifest this model of mental behavior in external behaviors that result in fearful conduct, worrying, wars, lack, and more. This is behavior driven by left-hemispheric thinking, intellectually justified and buttressed by the functions and modalities of left-hemispheric thinking modalities and information processing. This is a thinking mode we have come to regard as ego-consciousness, or proprioceptive homo-centered consciousness – a kind of individual and social solipsism.

In other words, left-hemispheric thinking modalities and information processing conceive of the external world as only real through the senses, and that its body consciousness is the boundary to its sense of “reality.” Anything beyond it is not certain to be “real,” unless the left-hemispheric intellectual derivation of what is real is buttressed by some aspect of its information processing of the external event. To a person who thinks in this fashion, UFOs don’t exist unless one lands in front of him or her.

Even a flash appearance of one in the skies that lasts a short while may be explained away or denied, depending upon how the person’s intellectual handling of the information is processed. Extraterrestrial groups on and around near Earth space are aware of the prevalence of this thinking modality in human beings. Therefore, members of these different groups encourage, advance, boost, further, and promote us to develop topological thinking.

Mental/sensorial Multitasking In Serial And In Parallel Modes

So what is it, and how does it work? To explain, we are going to use both left-hemispheric and right-hemispheric language. And then I am going to mix them up into a more fluid explanation.

In the former language set – left-hemispheric – it would be, using computation metaphors, being able to multitask fluidly both in serial and parallel fashions at the same time. By fluidly, we mean that one is able to easily slip initially from one information set (the meanings conveyed by the information flow) into another into another, then another without discomfort, but in an additive fashion.

In right-hemispheric explanation, for every information set one slips into, one adds that into the RAM memory set of one’s being and is able to remember what was processed in sequence and in parallel (from one to the next to the next to the next set), and at the same time also be able to detect, decode and quickly decipher relationships between the information sets, elements thereof, and connect these quickly and effortlessly, reaching and gaining new knowings as one goes forward in thinking in the given flow.

So we don’t “think about;” we think “in the flow” of something that never seems to end, but from which we can disconnect from to begin or enter into another flow. As one “grows” in the modality (i.e., becomes comfortable and at ease in the flow), one is able to retain most, if not all, of the “information set meaning processes” previously undergone while already in the next flow.

How is this possible? Can this be possible for us humans?

It is. When we cease relying on as an exclusively biochemical process and extend into a kind of bioelectronic, photonic memory, our information processing capacities experience a quantum jump of exponential rise. We are able to “store” memories in what we now referred to as our Meissner fields (the photonic field that surrounds our bodies), on the magnetic fields produced by currents that flow through the surfaces of our cells, even in the static charge in our cells themselves.

One must take into consideration that for every electrical charge in our bodies, there are magnetic fields off any tissue at 90 degrees from its surface. These fields are both energy and information. That is, our cells and our Meissner fields are capable of also carrying an information bandwidth in all electrical currents that also produce magnetic fields. All extraterrestrial groups on and in Earth near space have this capacity. And we need to develop it as well. Can we? Of course, we can.

Humans have already started to develop these capacities – some with assistance of energetic technologies that are capable of inducing a greater connectivity between neurons (increasing the neuronal capacity for information processing but only in the central nervous system’s cortical areas of the brain), while others with soft technologies of intelligence acceleration that are slowly coming out into the public domain. A topological thinking modality will allow one to grasp most if not all of what I am saying without any problems, getting the connections between the various concepts in the flow. It is this that is elsewhere referred to as a technology of intelligence acceleration.

Our New Imperative

Topological thinking then becomes the centerpiece of our new imperative. Without it, not much of what else we need to become may be fully connected in one’s mind to grasp where, collectively, we have to move toward. In terms of developing the abilities to connect with those who are not from here, it is necessary to realize early on that to grasp and get who, what, why, and where they are coming from may not be as complete on our part without this new thinking modality.

These people have not only the advantage of possessing topological thinking as a matter of course, but also have the capacity of mind-on-mind resonance via the use of extremely low frequency ranges to connect themselves mentally to us, and to others. In their cases, most of this is done with assistive technologies, some of which I am told we have retroengineered for ourselves, working forward in modifications to the initial Flanagan device and other earlier ones.

Should we then move toward developing topological thinking? We must. It is now not a choice of if, but a choice of when. There is also the expectation that those who choose not to may well be left behind, isolated, and disconnected. It is interesting to note that one particular hyperversal individual entity, with whom we’ve been in contact now for nearly a decade, tells us that we humans are eminently positioned today to develop these capacities because our overall information bandwidth is so much broader than those of extraterrestrials merely relying on mere mental mind-on-mind communication. Or what we know popularly as telepathy.

He tells us that they, themselves, are undergoing a kind of bootstrapping program to reintegrate into their capabilities the capacity to feel deeply, to love and to connect from the solar plexus – or their equivalent of that. It is not altogether surprising then – at least to me and those colleagues of mine who have contact with offworld species – that a majority of them find our emotive bandwidth a little too much to take at times, especially when we emote highly dense, highly charged emotions like anger and frustration.

Toward An Internal Psychophysiological “Soft Engineering” That Goes With Our New Imperative

To put it clearly in plain English, our new imperative is to develop the capacity to think topologically. Equally plain is our need to engineer this new capacity in ourselves. In the remainder of Part 1, let me lay out a bird’s eye view of the internal psychophysiological environment we need to develop to achieve some measure of topological thinking capacity.

It is known today that, as complex biological entities, we lose a lot of energy by the lifestyles we live. Thoughts that engender worry, fear, frustration, anger, and such other truly unnecessary and illogical byproducts of our daily interpretations of our experiences within of the world without, the behavior of others and the attributions we make to events and things that do not work in our lives – these are net energy loss states – thermal and bioelectric.

We need to learn not to want them in our lives, and to not produce them. What is the alternative? Well, in one word, it is the state of peace. We pay to learn to do TM and yoga and other meditation techniques in pursuit of the wellbeing brought about by internal peace – and I’m not just talking about the kicking in of momentary states of relaxation. I’m talking about an ongoing, internally instituted campaign of safeguarding our internal state of peace, because this state is the basis, the psychophysiological environment needed, to begin manifesting topological thinking capacities.

Why peace? Because it is literally a zero-point platform for our biominds (our bodies and minds connected as a working, feeling, sensing, computing tandem) to begin to manifest and act in higher integrated levels of functioning. Our capabilities to sense with all of our senses, to use our skins as literal antennas, our cortical brains as processing mind, and every aspect of the cytoskeleton of our cells and the fascia or connective tissue, are all viable means of perception, reception, and processing of information – albeit, without the spoken language that is the trademark of the cortical mind. Integrated functioning allows us as spirit-body-minds to relax our hearts, our tissues, the coils of our DNA and, energetically, express ourselves into extension well beyond 4-space/time. Just how do you think extraterrestrials set surveillance of our thoughtscapes?

As I was told, their surveillance is focused on the qualitative aspects of the manifest total of human thought at any one second of time, ad infinitum. And they are capable of culling through what they interface from our combined total thought behavior to find trends in them we are not aware we are producing. We broadcast powerfully – with all the means at our disposal I’ve described above – in more than just our 4-space/time Earth: our broadcast reaches realms in which energy is negative and matter is dark. Each one of our cells act like literal miniature black holes, and the sum total of our capacities when integrally manifest reaches octavials beyond our imagination.

So how do we harness this panoply of capacities into an engineer-able vector? How do we use our biomind as a highly amplified topological thinking powerhouse?

We start by learning how to work with our attention – broad external, broad internal, narrow external and narrow internal.

Attention is to grasping meaning and understanding what the eyes are to looking and seeing. Attention and sight are both propelled by an energetics that is often too low in power to measure (but it can be and has been), yet we can feel the eyes of a person looking at us from behind; we feel it in the back of our necks.

We deploy energy when we look and also deploy energy when we pay attention. But something funny happens to the energetic scale when we add a vectored intention to the mix: the scale goes off the chart! Something even more amazing happens when we pay attention in a peaceful state with a vector of intention: we can grasp as far as the nearest star (figuratively speaking)!

Something else also happens that we are just beginning to understand: all three-plus trillion cells align their electromagnetic fields to function much like an external drive in a computer. In other words, this results in a kind of additional computing capacity for the human biomind. It is like the networking of three-plus billion minicomputers in series and in parallel.

What can this upgrade in thinking produce? Well, if we go by what happens to children who are now coming on line, as it were, manifesting themselves as a leading edge of our evolution, quite a q-byte (tongue-in-cheek). Take, for instance, Mary Rodwell’s report on such children (add here link tohttp://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2007/05/15/01569.html).

Tibetan, Indian (from India) and Mexican children develop a kind of sign language with which they communicate among themselves and with extraterrestrials. (Two members of our scientific cooperative, funded by a private foundation, have been looking at this phenomenon for the past two years.) They report overt complex behaviors we can only understand as clairvoyant, psychokinetic and mind-on-mind telepathic.

SECOND IMPERATIVE
THE RIGHT TO DEFEND OUR BIOLOGY AGAINST THE DESIGNS OF HOSTILE ALIEN VISITORS (HAVs) AND THEIR HUMAN ALLIES

In a manner of preface, it must be said with all weight lend to the words used that the defense of our biology is both against HAVs, as well as invisible forces manipulated by these offworlders directly, indirectly, and by ideological means. While direct and indirect influence and control is the subject of another essay, a brief examination of ideology manipulated by these forces that do affect our biology is here in order.

The ideology in question, both equally reality as well as life condition to fourth fifths of humankind, is rampant, heartless capitalism. The corollary idea of human capital gets literally into our biological ‘pockets,’ turning each of us into replaceable parts of large corporate and industrial machines. It is the biological ‘pockets’ which are of eminent human concern for, in paying the piper for the privilege of earning a living, we get wooden nickels – paper money only backed by the economic soundness of the sector cartels, which altogether we know as national economies.

This is a keiretzu mentality that lives in hierarchical pyramids, which also serve as model for the stratification of entire social orders. In short, our biology is at stake, not only from the home front side, but also from the impressive designs of certain offworld aliens bent on hegemony over our world and our biology.

The right to defend our biology

There is much to be said about our defense of our own biology – a biology few people today have the broad picture, even scientists.

A right to defend our own biology? Yes. This is a “right” implicit to the thinking of all invited and observer extraterrestrial members of the Link. It is also a “right” yet poorly understood by human members, invited and observers alike. Do people of Earth understand the meaning of this “right” in the larger, galactic sense of the phrase? It is quite apparent, we do not. Therefore, in this chapter, I would like to explore the facets and phases of what this “right” implies and the biology we are to defend.

According to current paleoanthropological thinking, human beings have appeared on the face of the Earth some two million-plus years ago. We are said to be the product of a progression of evolutionary development. Here, however, I am not going to promote or endorse any one theory of evolution, because, from my point of view, none offer complete accounting for how homo sapiens sapiens came to be. What I will attempt to do is to offer insight into what it means to defend our biology, regardless of when, how, under what circumstances, and who were involved in our appearance on Earth. I will depart from the thought that we appeared, we are here, and we have a biology to use in service to the common of all human beings on Earth, and defend.

The Leading Edges Of Our Evolution

As biological entities, extraterrestrials know and understand (at least those who still depend upon their biological form to live in the universe) that their biology is the basis of their evolutionary manifestations. Off-world groups report they meet external challenges to their biokind by developmental contingencies manifest in the fold of their biology. They know and understand what living habitat requirements their biology has in order for each living form to continue to manifest life in the body. They also know what biological responses their bodies must perform to exigencies – sudden unforeseen challenges – faced by them under new, unexpected habitat conditions, planetary changes, and other urgent situations that threaten their biology, short of having to leave their ancestral planetary homes and move to a new one.

Additionally, when potentially catastrophic exigencies become apparent over time, e.g., living on a planet in a star system that is part of a galaxy that is being taken apart and engulfed by the stronger gravitational pull of another larger one, the range of choices for meeting this kind of challenge involves the need for time and information on the range of choices itself.

This has happened to more than one off-world group in the past, according to our records of conference proceedings. By the same token, there are often biological responses which the biology itself of the affected off-world group may contribute and help the life form meet the challenges better, ensuring the survival of the biokind. All of what I am saying now is predicated on what most, if not all, extraterrestrial biokinds have reported in the course of conferences: the common (the biomind of the entire biokind) acts externally and biologically in the best interest of the biokind, so that it may continue to survive and thrive as a civilization. This is a condition also predicated on the availability of important survival information to all members of the biokind.

When examined from the viewpoint of the kinds of response sets of off-world groups to exigencies and potentially catastrophic challenges to their home and their survival, humankind is at this time grossly unprepared to meet forthcoming Earth challenges to its integrity and structure, and consequently not conformed optimally for human survival and biological viability.

The most severe obstacle to optimal survival and biological viability is the absence of accurate, valid and species-wide information on upcoming planetary challenges to Earth and the human race on it. Humankind is also at a stark disadvantage at this juncture in its biological evolution, having achieved an amazing level of intelligence and technological achievement in merely 350,000+ years of existence as homo sapiens sapiens. Yet, its development of the common (biokind as a unified biomind) lags far behind its intellectual and technological achievements to date.

There are, however, growing indications of positive mutations in human beings able to function in an integrated fashion. By integrated I mean an organismic configuration of neural, enteromyofascial, cytoskeletal, and low voltage energetic functioning that makes them literally plugged into a kind of larger mind – that is, they are far better interconnective than the man or woman on the street. These people are noticed, primarily because their organisms and biominds work seamlessly internally, generating information that is consciously used by the individual for life quality, safety, survival and intellectual purposes, and externally, for interconnectivity purposes – to know if there is a highway patrol over the next hill so as to slow down and avoid getting a ticket, to know when someone thinks about this person, to identify the phone caller and know who is on the other end of the line before picking up the receiver, and much more.

Much of this latter behavior is often attributed to intuition and so-called ESP. Actually, it is not anomalous behavior, in the sense today defined and attributed by present day science. On the contrary, it appears to be a logical and necessary expansion of a kind of energetic metagenome that is literally superposed upon all DNA when manifest in spacetime.

Let me explain what I meant in the last paragraph. It is necessary that you gain a clear understanding of the preceding. It is a highly technical area, but I will make an attempt at clarifying things without using too many technical terms. In the next paragraphs we will explore together the meaning of what biology we must preserve and defend.

Over many millennia, the human body and the human mind have moved on a upward curve of biogenetic development and an evolution of mind. At this juncture in our evolution, we are finding ourselves moving forward with a leading edge of the evolutionary curve – human beings capable of seemingly astounding things.

These emerging capacities are not only as intelligence manifested in intellectual pursuits; they are also forms of intelligence that integrate the various manifestations of abilities and capabilities of a human being – an ability to love, to connect to another in subtle yet real ways not diminished by physical distance, the capability to sense the presence of another at a distance and know the wellbeing or discomfort of the other, the ability to see inside the human body without even having to be in the same room as the target, a capacity for emotion that often scares off-world people in its intensity and misuses by a human experiencer, an ability and capacity for music and art, a deeply and often abiding sense of the eternal and spiritual, a profound love for progeny, and a seemingly endless ability I believe wired in to generate, evolve, manifest and misuse culture. All of these manifestations of being human lie, in our opinion and in the opinion of those off-world conference participants, somewhere between our biogenetic legacy and the underdeveloped human biomind.

Our DNA have unique bioelectronic signatures, which hold the keys to both positive and negative mutations. A couple of years ago, Joseph Wang, director of the Center for Bioelectronics and Biosensors at the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, led a team effort that successfully merged work in the fields of biosensors, electronics, and nanotechnology to fashion nanocrystals that can act as “DNA biosensors” by electronically recognizing subtle mutations in human DNA.

This creates enormous potential for applications such as the diagnosis and treatment of genetic diseases, detection of infectious agents and reliable forensic analysis. Among the keys to unearthing the mysteries behind individual genetic variation and diseases like cancer are fine differences — single nucleotide polymorphisms, or “SNPs” — buried within the 3 billion chemical bases of DNA comprising the human genome. Not every SNP found will necessarily cause a mutation or determine our eye or hair color — but, on average, SNPs occur about once in every 1,000 DNA bases, adding up to 3 million potential individual differences across the human genome. Wang’s method allows for an accurate, ultra-sensitive, rapid and low-cost identification of these SNP variants.

Technological means are not the only way to detect and decipher effects through the biosignature of our DNA. Recently, some interesting work by a couple of Russian scientists (who published a book) came along so much along the same lines as the work done by Finnish, German, Russian and American scientists associated with the Journal of Non-Local & Remote Mental Interactions (JNL&RMI).

In their book Vernetzte Intelligenz, Grazyna Gosar and Franz Bludorf (so far only published in German), they characterize human DNA as a biological “internet” and superior in many aspects to the electronic one. There is evidence for a whole new type of medicine in which DNA can be influenced and reprogrammed by words and frequencies without cutting out and replacing single genes. Only 10% of our DNA is being used for building proteins. It is this subset of DNA that is of interest to western researchers and is being examined and categorized. The other 90% are considered “junk DNA.” The Russian researchers, however, convinced that nature was not wasteful, joined linguists and geneticists in a venture to explore the 90% of “junk DNA.” Their results, findings and conclusions are simply revolutionary.

According to their findings, our DNA is not only responsible for the construction of our body but also serves as data storage and communication. The Russian linguists found that the genetic code – especially in the apparent “useless” 90%” — follows the same rules as those of our human languages. They found that the alkalines of our DNA follow a regular grammar and do have set rules just like our languages. Therefore, human languages did not appear coincidentally but are a reflection of our inherent DNA.

The Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr (Peter) Garjajev (Gariaev) and his colleagues also explored behavior of DNA under exposure to frequencies of light and sound. They concluded that “living chromosomes function just like a holographic computer using endogenous DNA laser radiation.” This means that they managed, for example, to modulate certain frequency patterns (sound) onto a laser-like ray which influenced DNA frequency and thus the genetic information itself.

Since the basic structure of DNA-alkaline pairs and human languages are similar, if not identical, DNA decoding is automatized. One can simply use words and sentences of the human language. This, too, was examined experimentally to levels of confidence well beyond the .01 level. Living DNA substance (in living tissue, not in vitro) will always react to language-modulated laser rays and even to radio waves, if the proper frequencies (sound) are being used.

This lends weight to the explanation for why affirmations, hypnosis and other psychomotive methods can have such strong effects on the human mind and body. It is entirely normal and natural for our DNA to react to language. While western researchers cut single genes from DNA strands and insert them elsewhere, the Russians enthusiastically created devices that influence cellular metabolism through modulated radio and light frequencies, thus repairing genetic defects. They even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and transmitted it onto another, thus reprogramming cells to another genome.

So they successfully transformed, for example, frog embryos to salamander embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns! In this manner, the entire information was transmitted without any of the side effects or disharmonies encountered when cutting out and re-introducing single genes from the DNA.

This represents new level of knowledge and soft technology: by simply applying vibration (sound frequencies) and language instead of a surgical genetic procedure, we can actually affect our own DNA. These experiments point to the real capabilities of wave genetics, which we now know has greater influence on the formation of organisms than the biochemical processes of alkaline sequences alone. There are additional examples:

An Experiment By Dr. Vladimir Poponin. A container was emptied of air, so the only thing left was electromagnetic field. Poponin measured the energy distribution inside the container and found it was completely random. Then some DNA was placed inside the container and the field distribution was again measured. This time the energy was organized in an ordered way aligned with the DNA. In other words the ‘physical’ DNA is connected to the ‘non-physical’ energy field. Shortly thereafter, the DNA was removed from the container and the order was measured again. The field remained ordered with the arrangement created by the DNA.

Experimental Work at the Institute of HeartMath. Some human placental DNA (the most pristine form of DNA) was placed in a container from which Institute could measure changes. Twenty-eight vials of DNA were given (one each) to 28 trained researchers. Each researcher had been trained how to generate and feel feelings, and they each had strong emotions. What was discovered was that the DNA changed its shape in accordance to the feelings of the researchers:

1. When the researchers felt gratitude, love and appreciation, the DNA responded by relaxing and the strands unwound. The DNA strands became longer.

2. When the researchers felt anger, fear, frustration, or stress, the DNA responded by tightening up. It became shorter and switched off many of our DNA codes.

The shut down of the DNA codes was reversed and the codes were switched back on again when feelings of love, joy, gratitude and appreciation were felt by the researchers. Individuals trained in deep love were able to change the shape of their DNA. This recognizes energy or field as the connector of all creation, a tightly woven web that connects all seeming materiality. We’re able to participate in the web of creation through our operating frequency range at the moment. THIS is how we can create our reality – by choosing it with our feelings. Get yourself into feelings of joy, love, peace, healing, patience, respect, appreciation, wonder and gratitude — and focus on bringing that to our whole re-connecting world.

Experiments By The United States Army. Leukocytes (white blood cells) were collected for DNA from donors and placed into chambers so scientists could measure electrical changes in the samples. In one experiment, the donor was placed in one room and subjected to video clips, which were designed to generate different emotions in the donor. The DNA was in a different room in the same building. Both the donor and the subject’s DNA were monitored. As the donor exhibited emotional peaks or valleys (measured by electrical responses), the DNA exhibited the identical responses.

The military wanted to see how far away they could separate the donor from his DNA and still get this effect. They stopped testing after they separated the DNA and the donor by 50 miles, as the results continued to be the same. The DNA and the donor had the same identical responses. It means that life everywhere communicates through the Earth’s extremely low frequency electromagnetic field.

Our Biology: Much More Than Just A Genomic Blueprint

Until quite recently, it was widely held that individual genes directly controlled physical traits in the human body (even mental and behavioral traits, according to some experts). Now we know that a surprisingly large number of people have wild variations in their genetic code, such as multiple copies of the same gene, and entire genes missing from their DNA. Yet they are not walking around without a left lung, an arm, or missing all their nails. It is all quite shocking, at least from a Western scientific point of view, that merely 30,000+ genes are all that is necessary to build a human being.

There is definitely something wrong with the view that DNA is like a computer program containing sequential instructions for building a physical organism. In the current paradigm, there are not enough genes in the human genome to even build a human being. Yet, here we are. A human has about 30,000 genes, yet an adult human has trillions of specialized cells governed by millions of different chemical reactions. How do 30,000 genes control all these cells and all of their functions?

In 2001, we believed we had 100,000 genes and that simpler life forms had far fewer. Our view of ourselves as some “higher life form” by the presumed genomic complexity in comparison to assumed “lesser” complex life forms turned out to be quite wrong.

It turns out the mustard weed contains the same number of genes as humans, and the common mouse has nearly as many. From certain types of worms to common trees, there are many organisms on the planet that have very nearly the same number of genes as human beings (and some have even more). Even more surprising, human beings appear to actually be human-bacteria hybrids.

At least 200 genes in our genetic code were mysteriously borrowed from bacteria. No one is sure how they got there, but we are sure that they are there. Furthermore, if we were to look at the composition of cells in the typical human body, and started counting them all, one would realize that most of the cells in the typical human body are not human. Shocking, isn’t it? Yet, it is every bit true. The vast majority of cells in the human body are actually bacteria cells — some 100 trillion of them for a typical human being.

The important lesson in all of this is in understanding that the human organism does not exist in isolation to the world around it. Regardless of what we believe, we are all closer to Earth nature than we think. In fact, we are literally living with such nature inside us, permeating our cells and accounting for more of us than we realize.

There’s also no mention of epigenetics in any discussion of the human genome. We have recently learned, much to our surprise, that epigenetic factors control the expression of genes, activating or deactivating them based on environmental factors such as nutrition or exposure to synthetic chemicals and electromagnetic fields. Epigenetic factors are inherited and passed from generation to generation – a mother born with a mutated gift for prophecy when she conceives a child, the prophetical side effects of that gift will be passed down through multiple generations (at least four generations, according to some, but perhaps as many as seven according to others).

The same thing with malnutrition, or intelligence. Why the mother? It is she who passes on her mitochondrial DNA to her child, male and female. And yet, DNA is not the only archive of information that passes from mother to child. Even if we understood everything about DNA, we would still lack the big picture unless we also understood epigenetic factors. What we must do to avoid it is to stop adhering to the outlandish and outdated point of view that genes alone control everything, and that all disease and all gifts are predetermined, with environmental factors having little or no effect.

The Biowave Genome We Must Defend

So what lays beyond the current notion that the human genome is sort of like a biological computer program, a mere series of instructions that tells the cells how to construct a complete organism containing trillions of new cells? There are no clear theories as yet on how a mere 30,000 genes could account for the construction, maintenance and continuous operation of such a highly complex organism. Or for the organically produced energetic fields that emanate from all cell, which join as a single degree of freedom field ancient teachers then, and we now, know as the human aura. Or by its more technical name – the human Meissner-antiMeissner field. But there are now hints. This new paradigm is often referred to as biowave genetics, and variations thereof.

One aspect that whatever new paradigm supplants the present one must also take into consideration the multiple copies of many genes that have now been observed across a wide spectrum of the human population. Some people carry one, two, three or even four copies of the same gene. Interestingly, these are the human beings with least diseases, major or otherwise. We won’t find many of them in hospitals and clinics, seeking treatment for what ails the rest of us.

The natural progression of our biowave evolution provides, interestingly enough, for some of the mechanisms that allows the seemingly strange presence of more than one gene in a human being. Let me compare this phenomenon to the sound of a guitar or a piano. A complex sound such as a single note on a piano is not made up of a simple square wave tone, but is made up of highly complex harmonics which give the piano its own tone and timbre, a kind of distinct auditory personality. How do we know this? On an oscilloscope, they often appear as copies of the same underlying waveforms. They are also known as overtones. So, to offer a model (originally shared with us during a presentation at one of the annual conferences) applicable to human biology, let me use music as the medium of conveyance.

The physical biowave biology and genetics of a human being can be likened to a host of musical expression, rather than the mere applications of rules in a relatively static blueprint. When we examine the near perfect symmetry of the human body, at its surface and inside its domains, we see economies of scale and expression. There is fractal artistry in the way arteries and veins are patterned in the body. Epithelial (skin) cells in the fingertips do another form of artistry, governed by an invisible field that tells them how to form unique patterns we know as fingerprints.

Throughout the human body, from the lining of the cells of the stomach to the structure of the eye, you find patterns that go way beyond the mere application of blueprints to a biological canvass. The human body is a literal symphony as a grand musical masterpiece played out in billions of variations on every corner of our Earth.

The human DNA, it now theorized, is a holographic invisible from which the billions of genetic combination make a whole human being. The repeating patterns of genes and the symmetry of the double helix are all expressions of a music we are beginning to understand. The human genome is the symphony, and it is through this symphony that the music of life is played. Combined with environmental and energetic factors (such as parental love, interconnecting acceptance and openness), the symphony of human DNA creates a physical being. Yet, it is not all there is. It also creates the framework of an emotional being, an energetic entity and a spiritual (interconnecting) biomind.

This is music a rationalist neither hears nor, if he or she could, would understand. To a rationalist, a human being is an anatomy and physiology that can be understood only in their comparments, separated by tradition and by training. To such a mind, there is no connection between living things, and creatures large and small are nothing more than players in cruel game proudly called survival of the fittest.

Instead, we say we are all uniquely creative expressions of a universal music we are beginning to hear. In this vein, it is very interesting that some off-world groups identify another member of the group by a combination of electromagnetic and sound signatures. DNA is yet a mystery, much like a good symphony, or a novel, or the collection of poetry of some grand designer. So, if words were genes, by using the frameworks of expression that guide each word, we could have a whole human being. To make the foregoing more apparent, let’s use an example that will clarify things globally. In the box below, all words represent a gene.

Can you make any sense of the separate letters of the human being that is formed from all of them? The scrabbled form above is the way in which scientists today look at the human genome; each “word” stands by itself, for the purpose of guiding the formation of a structure to which it is believed to be correlated only by a biochemistry said to govern everything else. Scientists today even use the term “words” to describe genes, describing the variations in the protein sequences as different “spellings” of those words. Yet, they completely miss the grammar of those words: the music, the poetry, the linguistics. So let me take those same words (genes) and rearrange them to reveal poetry, thanks to poetry of its creator, Robert Frost:

Fire and Ice

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.

They are the same words scattered linearly inside the box above, but now suddenly they create something complex and intelligent, for more than the simple sum of their parts. Through the arrangement of the symphony of the words, Robert Frost takes us to the meaning of life itself, and the end of the world as we know it. All is brought forth by a set of words, meaningless when isolated, absent the context of their interrelationships, their holographic relationships in the whole.

Albeit made a metaphor above, it is the same thing with our biology and the biominds we are. It is this the biology we are, that we have, that we must defend against all enemies, off-world and earthly. It is this biology from and through which our species interconnects within itself, and interconnects to all other biokinds in the universe. It is also the biology that underpins the HumanOne and the HumanOrg envisioned on the pages of THE LINK, my forthcoming book.

THIRD IMPERATIVE
KNOW THYNE COMPETITION

From the outset, let’s establish clearly that what, in the popular UFO literature is referred to as “the government,” does not work in quite as monolithic a way as assumed, for profitable CE5s (close encounters of the fifth kind) are not through an organism of governance that is massive, rigid, and totally uniform. In fact, often it will not even involve the executive arm of government itself – except for the intelligence group operating within the umbrella SCI that is involved in any one of three types of CE5s: quid pro quos, TTPs, or outright piracy arrangements. This is often the case because of a penchant to avoid exposure and oversight (the latter when public monies may be involved in a given arrangement).

Thus, the less public officials know about above black (astro, cosmic and other high classification level) projects, the less they can disclose when in a political situation that may place them in a position of having to do so. This is evident from the fiction and nonfiction works of such writers as Michael Wolf and Phillip Corso, two insiders who knew how things worked.

Some CE5s involve just one of the three, while others are TTPs inside quid pro quos. Another arrangement is the pirate tradeoff conducted within a quid pro quo with one or another intelligence/corporate groups higher in the astral contact food chain. Finally, there is the popular TTP inside a piracy agreement. And these are only the ones that I was able to decipher so far.

It is known through contact field work with members of extraterrestrial groups already on the surface that, broadly speaking, governance (that is, governmental organisms in the United States, Europe, Russia, China, and other major powers) is involved, often albeit tangentially, but broadly informed of quid pro quos and TTPs and pirate arrangements. In fact, it is pirate arrangements that will often involve governmental units, usually with the full awareness and consent of lower echelon in the executive branch (part of the “don’t-know, can’t tell,” “don’t ask, won’t tell,” and plausible deniability strategies commonly used).

However, for the sake of fairness, it should be made clear that in nearly all of such arrangements, the executive branch is at worst powerless to fight the arrangement, or de-motivated to do anything due to often tangential gains made in the deal. Sources in the literature as well as human-extraterrestrial contacts on the ground have corroborated the substance of the previous statements.

No two arrangements will be or function in identical fashion to others. The human equivalent would be to say that these are business-like arrangements in the literal sense of the phrase. The keys to the functioning of any such arrangements, from our viewpoint, appear to be several. They seem to involve the power level of the participants, the imperatives of each of the parties, and the level of need of each in relation to what the other brings to the negotiating, and then the “workshop” or field operation table.

These considerations are often weighty, and seem to take the bulk of the negotiating time between the parties. The imponderable in this mix is, almost always, the level of trust between them, mostly framed by the relationship between the parties and the communication style of the extraterrestrial group. For instance, the least trusted of the Messier groups (extragalactic groups coming from identified Messier galaxies) is the gray band, composed of several groups that are described as “mentally aggressive” in the course of contact, as well as during any negotiation. Yet, not all grays are said to be that way.

Although technically not extragalactic, the sauroid grays from the Zeta Reticuli in our Milky Way are subjugates to another life form of extragalactic origin. Being nonsexual, their mind-on-mind (MOM) communication style is altogether different than, say, that of the Verdants (a sexually reproductive group), or the Elders. These differences in communication styles are examined in great detail in my forthcoming book.

Sociopolitical relationships and lessons for us

It is interesting, as a quick aside here, that extraterrestrial groups operating in near Earth space maintain relationships among themselves roughly classifiable as subjugate (when one holds control over the other by technological superiority, sheer numbers, expansionistic policy, or panspermic “rights”), conjugates (when control is not the preeminent issue between two or more groups, and imperatives-driven political initiatives are), and synjugates (that is, groups such as what we have come to call the Link, driven by intragroup policies that establish a common interest across many issues, that choose to come together in a kind of adhocracy, or adhoc grouping according to a prevalence of need). In all of the sociopolitical arrangements mentioned above, the underlying energetic thread that drives the formation and formulation of the arrangement is the group imperative(s) inscribed as group policy.

It is my distinct impression that, while for some the issue of control is eminent in their policies and sociopolitical strategies, it is such groups that tend to present the most problematic of situations to all groups in this and other galaxies; the problem is an ecological one, but not just in the sense of an ecology as we think of here on Earth. The expanded view of galactic ecology involves the uses and misuses of what is now known as electrogravity. I examine this scientific issue and the problems associated with its misuse by certain extraterrestrial populations as a grave ecological problem in Chapter 11 of my forthcoming book.

As to population statistics, I don’t have anything to contribute here, except to say that, from what those in the group I belong to have heard in the course of the annual conferences (four in a row for myself), the numbers offered by both journalists (Phil Krapf and George LoBuono.) seem to be ballpark figures. However, I don’t have any comparison figures to dispute, correct, or advance new numbers on the matter.

Conjugate and synjugate alien groups represent much of our hope for ourselves as a biokind, in my view. When two or more groups come together in a kind of political arrangement in pursuit of conjugate political objectives, these groups seem to become a grid of control, coordination and cooperative deployment of assets and presence directed in unison at the objective. The objective may be, as it was more than once reported during the course of the annual conferences I attended, wayward planets or locally expansionary populations taking up life-bearing planets for themselves at the expense of other populations, developing civilizations on planets abusing electrogravity indiscriminately, extending technology transfer to other planets as equalizing measures against hegemony by competing ones, and more.

The Link, however, has all the makings of a synjugate arrangement between several groups coming together for a common goal. In what I here (and the scientific cooperative I belong to) call The Link, the arrangement is ad hoc; that is, these group came together by seeming common interests and prevalence of needs, based on similar group imperatives. There are no formal treaties between them, or with us for that matter, for the conferences to take place. They just do.

Each of the extraterrestrial groups organize them, a different one each year; only three times were they arranged and organized by Earth participant groups. The organizing group for the year sends out announcements by gnosive MOM means and by more mundane means – internet and telephone (if and when possible), messenger (most likely), and letters (where possible).

There are lessons for the humankind Biomind in all of these arrangements. But from the outset, it must be made clear here that the analysis that follows is neither a condemnation or condoning of what already exists. They do, and there isn’t very much we can do to undo them. What we can, and should consider, is to learn from what already is and adapt what is already familiar to extraterrestrial groups to begin doing the same with the “unofficial” human biomind, by way of organized nongovernmental organizations with a Biomind-wide awareness of human imperatives, which can then be taken seriously with those extraterrestrial groups open to direct contact with organisms such as what is proposed in this book. This is precisely what is, at present, from the conferencing and field tables of discussion and exchange – something we will often hear from them as harangues to get ourselves together.

THE LESSONS IN THE ARRANGEMENTS MENTIONED ABOVE

Alvin Toffler, the noted 1970s futurist, once mentioned that future generations would gather in special interest groups he called adhocracies. Adhocracies today go by various names, all leading to the same result (people coming together drawn by a commonality of awareness and interests on issues, problems and opportunities), and they are formalized as unions, societies, groups, associations, nonprofit organizations and such other names that denote the purpose ascribed to the actionable points of view of people assembled by a commonality of interests in a given area.

Toffler’s adhocracy concept may then well be the most powerful, decentralized way of conforming a future HumanOrg that can deal itself into the current picture of negotiations and discussions with extraterrestrial groups interested in such contact arrangements. Moreover, there is nothing that would prevent such adhocracies from forming a representative organism (HumanOrg) with which to speak with one voice and be taken seriously on the playing field. Our analysis of current human affairs indicates that humankind is already aware of the tools, but yet not fully aware of their potential and dynamics uses with regard to the extraterrestrial challenges we face.

Another lesson in this field is that adhocracies would have to be based on membership numbers – not in the hundreds, or thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, but in the millions – a seemingly daunting task, yet not an impossible one. To begin approaching the idea with a consciousness of actionable intention, we can take umbrage and transform the anger into an actionable plan based on the vision already expressed, albeit fictionally, by W. P. Kinsella (in his book) and by Phil Alden Robinson (screenplay), in the movie Field of Dream – “Build it and they will come.” But, build what?

To answer the question, we must now look at the mechanics, dynamics and organization of the kinds of govorg/extraterrestrial arrangements mentioned above. In all of them, regardless of the power relationships between the members in the arrangement, the governmental/corporate adhocracies are based upon exchange, trade and tradeoffs. In more ways than one, these appear to use a fluid, field-of-mind approach to the formalized arrangement and to the way in which the exchanges, trading, and tradeoffs are conducted.

There is always something ET groups need or want, something gov/corp-orgs want in exchange, and therein come the tradeoffs –mostly for the latter, who are often in the lesser-power position from which to negotiate any trade. The results are TTPs, quid pro quos, and look-the-other-way arrangements, often too imbued with a fear-driven and almost fatalistic we-can’t-stop-them-so-they-will-do-what-they-want-anyway mindset in the gov/corp-orgs involved in the arrangements. Whether real or merely perceived by human counterparts, extraterrestrial pirate group intentions govern the nature, power inequality, trade substance, and tradeoffs for the receiving gov/corp-orgs participating in them. And we know them to manage by using force in gradients that appear commensurate to the infraction – a hit here, a disappearance there, an abduction or a series of them, the terrorizing of families of the infraction perpetrators to gain control of their hearts, minds and behavior – often conducted by the security forces of the lesser in the power relationship: the gov/corp-orgs – and more. Any such campaign in place is designed to instill compliance through fear and inaction by anticipation of consequences.

In beneficent arrangements – and yes, there are some – the mechanics, dynamics and organization are similar. There are imperatives on both sides. Usually the extraterrestrial group will make the initial approach. Initial negotiations ensue. An arrangement is forged. An action site (i.e., a place where both groups can safely work together) is found and personnel from both groups assigned and deployed. An infrastructure of exchange is created. If a TTP is involved, the technology is assigned within the technology development/technology retroengineering grid.

Tight security controls are instituted from the start. An economic infrastructure is established (or assigned) to meet the fiscal and technologic needs of the new “program.” A management team is put in place and fiscal/operational controls are instituted. And the program is under way. Meanwhile, the extraterrestrial group harvests what it negotiated to get, and the gov/corp-org involved gets what it covets most – technologic means and some degree of ascendancy in the contact food chain. In the final decades of the 20th century, this “food chain” has turned into a veritable Gantt-type grid, controlled and operated by an unaccountable group within one of the top agencies of the U.S. government – the Labyrinth Group within the NSA.

What lessons lie therein?

It is said that the best kind of flattery is to copy what is already done. Another saying goes, “if it is not broken, don’t fix it.” Dispensing with all New Age nonsense about why extraterrestrials are here, we need to ask ourselves – what do they need while in our neighborhood? The answer to this question is most obvious to anyone with an entrepreneurial mind: sustenance in the form of food and potable water, materiel (objects we produce from adapted technologies to suitable Earth materials) and materials of a specific nature (technology [believe it or not], sand, mined ore, water and other supplies).

In ways not suspected in the public domain, the dependency on the part of more than one extraterrestrial group on suppliers from Earth is near complete. In fact, a whole secret “supply industry” has sprung over the last 40 years in this country, South America, southeast Asia, and the steppes of Russia. The catch is that production is to the buyer’s specifications. Animal protein supplies range from bull meat, goat milk and meat, poultry (including chickens, turkey, geese, Cornish hens and wild turkeys), and fish (mostly farmed salmon and trout); vegetable consumption centers around garden vegetable varieties, maize and corn meal to specification, fruits, raw unprocessed honey, all varieties of nuts, olives and olive oil, raw bark chips from specified trees (for teas, purgatives and diuretics), herbs and spices (all kinds, especially Chinese), and beer-making materials.

Certain extraterrestrial groups are known to like good beer (which to them appears to be heavy but pasteurized Pilsner-types) and products of good vine (all types of wines). Does anyone see opportunity here? The question becomes: what are their specifications? Who the buyers are for each of the groups? And, how often and how much?

If you think I am crazy, think again. This is already going on. There are people already producing things to group specs, and likely don’t know they are doing so for extraterrestrials. On occasion, their inspectors will come to the production site to get a close up view of how things are done on the workshop floor. Here is an opportunity: there is no “approved list” of producers. Their buyers are likely to be located in Miami or Cedar Rapids, Iowa, or somewhere in the states of Rio Grande do Norte or Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Some are plugged into the grid; others are completely oblivious about whom they serve. And not all producers are part of large food manufacturing and packaging companies.

To do business with them, however, is not a matter of picking up the Yellow Pages, looking up under “Extraterrestrial Providers,” and calling a number. This is the reason we used Kinsella and Robinson’s metaphor – “Build it and they will come.” Build what? A network of worldwide producers (as nongovorgs) aligned with what we earlier referred to as HumanOrg – a kind of umbrella organization for nongovernmental organizations learning how to act in synchronous and synjugate fashion, as what we would call the “one-degree of freedom” organization or alignment of human groups acting as one.

The door to business with extraterrestrial groups, we were told at last year’s conference, will initially be through field contacts and in our opinion, ultimately, through HumanOrg. There are some knowledgeable, experienced and shrewd field human operatives at present who can well assist in the forging of trade relationships. I was told by one of my extraterrestrial informants that trade – an almost universal activity upon which entire galactic and intergalactic economies are based – was an avenue to contact, raising relaxation zones, and widening comfort levels between the various extraterrestrial groups and us.

It is expected that human organizations not aligned with govorgs, set up to trade with extraterrestrials, will become engage in trading relationships with them first, before any synjugation (coming into a singularity of purpose) begins to occur. Synjugation may well have to be the product of an organized conspiracy on behalf of the human race by humans in alignment with such groups that adapt to, accept, and honor our own declared imperatives.

There are problems along the way to human synjugation. Not all extraterrestrial groups think highly of us. Some regard us as not better than lab rats, others as food, and still others as children growing up. Almost universally, all of them fear our bicamerality of mind, the license we give to their expression in our daily lives, and results we create by their effects on our interaction with each other – wars, lack, pestilence, hunger, and other byproducts of human degrees of separation. There is also much homework we must do as a biokind and biomind. The word ‘homework’ is used here as the educational metaphor that may guide our transformation. Another may be to evolve by choice.

A more proper and accurate metaphor in what we must make happen would be bootstrap evolution. An aspect of it is to transform our beliefs about the existence of extraterrestrial life – from something we would only believe if one of them landed on the lawn of the White House and said, “Take me to your leader,” to one more realistic and more substantial. As a start, we need to deWheatleysize ourselves from thinking that the only “aliens” have big black eyes and abduct humans as some part of a hybridization program. Not that this is not true and happening, it is and it has in the past. But it is not the whole picture and nothing but the truth, so help us all.

What follows must include the notion that there are others who are not from here who look exactly like us, others who are sauroid-looking, and more. The United States Government, at least the parts of it commissioned to deal with these visitors, know them and know the various biotypes here. They know their biologies and social structures, origin and numbers. This is knowledge held so secret that only those awarded the Astro and Cosmic level of classified access at the least, and higher levels, may know and learn about as subjects of study – exobiology, exopolitics, exosocial dynamics, exothreat, and more. Much is already known in these circles. This is the main reason that the bulk of humankind as the biomind of Earth must also know and learn about them. We suggest in this chapter, and in chapter to come, that the way to get to know them is by interaction and interface with them on frameworks of mutual interest.

They know our “bad side,” as it were. Now it is time they also know the best of who and what we are. And to know us, we must first know ourselves as the best we are and can become to be.

FOURTH IMPERATIVE
KNOW THYSELF

The transition of the mammalian life form that became complex enough to express intelligence, that is us as homo sapiens sapiens (or Thinking Man) has not entirely been left to nature and to chance. There is considerable archeotechnical and archeoanthropological evidence that, not only did we come out of eastern Africa, but that a “lab” existed both above ground and underground north of the Ngorongoro area in Tanzania. I was once part of a team examining these remnants, and very interesting pieces of evidence were found at these sites. The work done by the Leakeys was a kind of semifinal nail on that cross, followed by mitochondrial DNA evidence of an Eve some 250,000-plus years ago, and the distribution of genetic haplogroups across the Earth simply went far in convincing us (especially me) that it all started there, and went out from there.

Interestingly, there is sufficient evidence too, now, that our genome is not only evolving at high speed, but that it also has commonalities with those of other intelligent life forms that have relationships (as TTP or technology transfer programs) with various organs of our government (and others across the world). It seems that, once upon a time, there was something of a pristine, “genesis DNA” of sorts. But that’s beyond the scope of our little discussion here. What is not, however, is the set of differences in rate and range of expression between DNA from offworld intelligent life forms (some, not all I know about) and ours.

Even among us humans today, the rate of expression is a significant factor in discriminating between people who live sanely and healthily, and people who live driven by fear and self-repression. We know now that interaction with our own DNA involves a similar, if not identical, set of access means driven by common or natural language sets – that is, we can talk our DNA into contracting its coils or relaxing and expanding them at will, with significant differences in the quality of life and health of people who do either one or the other. This is a factor currently being massively manipulated by hands both invisible and powerful enough (my own conclusion) to set up social and psychological environments highly propitious to instrumental conditioning and response set development on our part that are convenient and necessary to their control and manipulation. This is especially true of the economy and expectations of the citizenry.

We are not only being suppressed in overt expression of opinions, views, personal lifestyles that do not promote and contribute to the seemingly established goal of “social instability and psychological chaos,” as one informant of mine put it, but also in our internal rate and range of genetic expression of our own DNA!

Who we are

As a species, or more properly, biokind (biological kind), we humans of Earth have a most promising future indeed, if left to our own devices. But we are not, and won’t be, so long as powerful offworld interests already merged with certain national interests in the form of TTPs (technology transfer programs) continue unabated. The answers to what and who we are and why we won’t be allowed to manifest our full regalia of capabilities are closely intertwined and must be considered together.

We are complex oscillating biological entities of broad horizontal connectivity (connectivity in our own 4-space/time) and unusually deep vertical connectivity (or the ability to extend in octavials damn near to the doors of heaven itself). One of the things we keep being reminded of by hyperversals entities (or people who actually live in space/times that are completely orthogonal, or off-phase to us here) is that, while we have yet to traverse a still longer evolutionary pathway, we are at this stage quite capable of the feats they are (i.e., travel in space and time without having to use a vehicle in space or leave our bodies behind in time), but don’t know how because we have told ourselves it is impossible, or worse yet, a sin. Yet, we are told that these capabilities are literally inscribed in the still relatively pristine DNA of the kids being born today, and in the DNAs of adults who have guarded closely the preservation of the internal child.

Knowing then who and what we are, it is obvious that this is not in the best interest of biokinds who either have suppressed their own range and rate of genetic expressions such that they are not able to do what we can, or have become dependent (some would say, addicted) to external means of interconnectivity (which, I’m finding out, is also a means of control, correction and suppression). We have in us partial DNA sequences from another life form that came to Earth 450,000 years ago; this we know with considerable certainty now.

What is not known about them is that their dependence (no, addiction) to ORME gold has contributed to a considerable densification of genetic sequences (i.e., the need to artificially induce the regrowth and slowed shortening of telomeres between genes [a kind of biological clock to our cells] to induce a kind of artificially supported longevity, which we are now trying to copy for ourselves). We do not yet realize that this is possible by means open to what our children today are capable of doing, which is to set up induction protocols that lead to the same results without dependence on any external technology or substance.

TO BE CONTINUED
————————-

Will read and comment on your reply later. Again, no name (even though there is reference to a book being written).

Posted in Exopolitical Interventions | Tagged: Central Intelligence Agency, cia, Intel, Intel Corporation, Non-governmental organization, Social Sciences, United Nations, Washington | Leave a Comment »

Revolutionising Awareness

How to save Awareness

Archives

Email Subscription

Categories

Posts Tagged ‘Washington’

America's Endless Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq

Pakistan and "The Haqqani Network" : The Latest Orchestrated Threat to America and The End of History

On October 6, Let's Make a National Clamor for Peace

Did Earth encounter pieces of an alien visitor yesterday?

US-Saudi arms deal ripples from Iran to Israel

How to save Awareness

Archives

Email Subscription

Categories

Posts Tagged ‘Washington’

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Related Articles

Share this:

Like this:

Related Articles

Share this:

Like this:

Related Articles

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: